Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 13:17
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
AI Cracks Mars Mystery: 500,000 Streaks Solved Without a Drop of Water - SciTechDaily
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
$10,000 2-year CD accounts: Here's why they're worth opening now - CBS News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Are there scientific studies that support the detox benefits of an infrared sauna blanket?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
World-First: Scientists Capture a Rare Lightning-Triggered Gamma-Ray Burst - SciTechDaily
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Geert Wilders: Dutch government collapses as far-right leader exits coalition - BBC
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is the reason for writing X^2 as XX instead of X*X?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
How does Taylor Swift make sure that she doesn’t show her uterus to her audience and fans?
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.